![© Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky © Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YsVXCu8S0MI/VWWlXSYcNuI/AAAAAAAAGrw/bPSoLGbcgzI/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Adidas-logo-Wallpaper-29.jpg)
© Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
![The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed](https://script-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/mancinella_fig2.png)
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed
![The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed](https://script-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/mancinella_fig3.png)
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed
![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0Hf7ibDSkFw/VWWjc-ifcSI/AAAAAAAAGqs/jweqCi9rjk4/s1600/Naamloos1.png)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
![Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard](http://ipwhiteboard.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/K-Swiss-5-stripe-CTM.png)
Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard
![Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard](http://ipwhiteboard.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Shoe-Branding-Europe-BVBA-pants-parallel-stripes-CTM.png)